lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[ 12/78] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH
3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>

commit 5289966ea576a062b80319975b31b661c196ff9d upstream.

This has been moved from .options to .bbt_options meanwhile. So, it
currently checks for something totally different (NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) and
decides according to that.

Artem Bityutskiy: the options were moved in
a40f734 mtd: nand: consolidate redundant flash-based BBT flags

Artem Bityutskiy: CCing -stable

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
@@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ static int gpmi_block_markbad(struct mtd
chip->bbt[block >> 2] |= 0x01 << ((block & 0x03) << 1);

/* Do we have a flash based bad block table ? */
- if (chip->options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH)
+ if (chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH)
ret = nand_update_bbt(mtd, ofs);
else {
chipnr = (int)(ofs >> chip->chip_shift);



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-12 02:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site