[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] nextfd(2)
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin <> wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 05:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> I know the reason. fcntl(F_NEXT) is one of a proposal of next SUS enhancement.
>> nextfd() has a semantics of F_NEXT.
> Looking at that bug report, it sounds like that proposal was rejected.


If I understand correctly, above URL says, latest satatus is

Resolution: Accepted As Marked

Please see toppest issue summary. Or if I am missing something, can you please
point out which line are you seeing?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-11 21:23    [W:0.134 / U:2.780 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site