[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove BUG() in possible but rare condition
    On 04/11/2012 03:57 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Michal Hocko<> wrote:
    >> I am not familiar with the code much but a trivial call chain walk up to
    >> write_dev_supers (in btrfs) shows that we do not check for the return value
    >> from __getblk so we would nullptr and there might be more.
    >> I guess these need some treat before the BUG might be removed, right?
    > Well, realistically, isn't BUG() as bad as a NULL pointer dereference?
    > Do you care about the exact message on the screen when your machine dies?
    Not particular, but I don't see why (I might be wrong) it would
    necessarily lead to a NULL pointer dereference.

    At least in my test cases, after turning this to a WARN (to make sure it
    was still being hit), the machine could go on just fine.

    I was running this in a container system, with restricted memory. After
    killing the container - at least in my ext4 system - everything seemed
    as happy as ever.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-11 21:07    [W:0.019 / U:4.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site