Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:59:56 +0100 | | From | Mark Brown <> | | Subject | Re: common clk: fix clk_register_fixed_rate() under memory pressure |
| |
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:52:15PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> Thanks for the patch Domenico. I did a big cleanup of the > registration code for all of the basic clock types and a fix for this > has already been rolled in to that branch, so I won't be taking this > patch. I'll Cc you on the fixes when I send them to the list > (probably tomorrow).
Would it be possible for you to keep a tree in -next? There's been several people sending patches like this which have been superceeded by your work and this might help avoid such duplicated work.
|  |