lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the arm tree
From
Date
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 16:52 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:51 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Mikey,
> >
> > On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ.
> > >
> > > In fact, keeping MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to make SPARSE_IRQ user
> > > selectable, which we don't want anymore since ad5b7f1350c2.
> >
> > Yes, indeed. I will fix up the merge resolution for tomorrow.
>
> This is my fault. Grant's patch had a collision and I manually fixed it
> up. While doing that, I put back MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ which the patch
> originally took out.

Actually, I didn't keep MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, I kept HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. If
I remove it, then I get Kconfig warnings:

warning: (PPC) selects SPARSE_IRQ which has unmet direct dependencies (HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS && HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ)

Cheers,
Ben.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-09 00:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans