Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:28:22 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9] Regulator: Add Anatop regulator driver |
| |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:36:22PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > This really doesn't seem at all sane for a device which is already > > vendor specific, it's just noise in the bindings.
> No it's
...?
> Here is a good example as we have regulator generic binding & vendor > specific bindig
It's not vendor specific, it's device specific and people are doing it even for devices with no generic bindings at all which is particularly silly.
Device specific prefixes probably make sense, but vendor specific ones are just noise. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |