lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume
On 03/07/2012 02:15 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:

> This is fix for suspend/resume regression introduced in commit 8f2f748b0656
> ("CPU hotplug, cpusets, suspend: Don't touch cpusets during suspend/resume")
> Without this patch suspend always hangs on my thinkpad x220 (2 x CPU * HT).
>


Hey, with commit 8f2f748b0656, suspend/resume works perfectly for me! I ran it
multiple times just to make sure, and everything worked just great.

Apart from that, I even tried suspend/resume after building the kernel with
and without CONFIG_CPUSETS. Both cases worked perfectly.

So, I am really surprised at what you stated above. Are you *really* sure you
are facing suspend hangs *because* of the above commit?

And AFAICS hardware doesn't matter for the code in question, but in any case,
the laptop on which I tested it is:
Thinkpad T420 (Intel core i5-2540M), 2 cores * HT (total 4 logical cpus).

Also, the patch you posted here doesn't make much sense.. nor does it give a
clue as to what might be wrong at your end (if anything is really wrong, that
is). Do you have CONFIG_CPUSETS set or unset? Could you share your .config?

Coming to your patch, assuming you have CONFIG_CPUSETS enabled, then,
calling rebuild_sched_domains() at that point is useless because the cpusets
weren't changed at all. So generate_sched_domains() would generate the same
sched domain partitions that is already there.. And hence
partition_sched_domains() would essentially do nothing.. no sched domain is
destroyed, and no new domains are created.

However, if CONFIG_CPUSETS is unset, then, before commit 8f2f748b0656,
partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL) would have been invoked, thus rebuilding
a single sched domain. And that is why I specifically also tested commit
8f2f748b0656 with CONFIG_CPUSETS unset - and that also worked fine (as I
mentioned above).

So could you please check again?

By the way, you can use the pm-test framework (see Documentation/power/basic-
pm-debugging.txt) to pin-point which stage is causing the hang.
Specifically, the stage where CPU hotplug is done is 'processors'.

So you should probably try out this level:
# echo processors > /sys/power/pm_test
# echo mem > /sys/power/state
Replacing processors with core enables even deeper level suspend testing.

> cpuset_update_active_cpus() not only juggles with bits in cpusets,
> it also calls sched-domains rebuilding after all.
>
> This patch restores sched-domain rebuilds, as it was before that commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9995eb0..0fb7406 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6732,6 +6732,10 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_active(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
> case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> cpuset_update_active_cpus();
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> + case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
> + rebuild_sched_domains();
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> default:
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
> @@ -6744,6 +6748,9 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
> case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
> cpuset_update_active_cpus();
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> + case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
> + rebuild_sched_domains();
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> default:
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>


Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
IBM Linux Technology Center



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-07 14:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site