lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: TCP_STREAM performance regression on commit b3613118
On 03/06/2012 04:11 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:07:43PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Alex Shi<alex.shi@intel.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:45:17 +0800
>> >
>>> > > Add CC to tang feng, He is working on this issue.
>> >
>> > Is he? I'm pretty sure this is due to the TCP receive window growing
>> > issue Eric Dumazet, Neal Cardwell and I are discussing in the thread
>> > starting at:
>> >
>> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=132916352815286&w=2
> Yes, probably, as we did find some clue related with the tcp_r/wmem.
>
> Here is the regression we found:
> On some machines, we found there is about 10% resgression of netperf
> TCP-64K loopback test between 3.2 and 3.3-rc1. The exact test is:
> ./netperf -t TCP_STREAM -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -i 50,3 -I 99,5 -- -s 32768 -S 32768 -m 4096
>
>
> The test machine is a 2 socket Quad Core Core 2 Duo server(2.66GHz) with
> 8 GB RAM. Following are the debug info (ifconfig/netstat -s/tcp_rwmem)
> before and after the test:
>
> The most obvious differences I can see are:
> 1) 311 GB vs 241 GB from ifconfig
> 2) the difference of the tcp_r/wmem

Hi:

Could you try the newest kernel? Looks like the difference has been
already fixed by commit c43b874d5d714f271b80d4c3f49e05d0cbf51ed2.

Thanks


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-06 09:29    [W:0.067 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site