lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree
    Hello,

    The patch "CPUfreq ondemand: handle QoS request on DVFS response latency" that introduced the mentioned errors requires the patch "PM / QoS: Introduce new classes: DMA-Throughput and DVFS-Latency" get merged, too. I guess that patch will be at pm-qos tree if get merged (v2 patch has been released 7 days ago).


    Cheers!
    MyungJoo.

    ------- Original Message -------
    Sender : Stephen Rothwell<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
    Date : 2012-03-01 11:56 (GMT+09:00)
    Title : linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree

    Hi Dave,

    After merging the cpufreq tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
    allmodconfig) failed like this:

    drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_init':
    drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:880:28: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
    drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit':
    drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:896:25: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)

    Caused by commit 500e8ca39c56 ("[CPUFREQ] ondemand: handle QoS request on
    DVFS response latency").

    I have used the cpufreq tree fomr next-20120229 for today.
    --
    Cheers,
    Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
    http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/



    --
    MyungJoo Ham (함명주), PHD
    System S/W Lab, S/W Platform Team, Software Center
    Samsung Electronics
    Cell: +82-10-6714-2858
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-05 02:49    [W:0.023 / U:29.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site