lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sysrq: Use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig()
On 03/28, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:52:54 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > No, this depends on 629d362b9950166c6fac2aa8425db34d824bb043
> > "signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE".
>
> oop, I meant "this patch looks like 3.4 material"?

Ah, yes, in this case I agree.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-28 23:35    [W:0.052 / U:1.088 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site