lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sysrq: Use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig()
    On 03/28, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >
    > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:52:54 +0200
    > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
    >
    > > No, this depends on 629d362b9950166c6fac2aa8425db34d824bb043
    > > "signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE".
    >
    > oop, I meant "this patch looks like 3.4 material"?

    Ah, yes, in this case I agree.

    Oleg.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-28 23:35    [W:0.019 / U:32.960 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site