Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:09:09 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: Let the compiler add the function name |
| |
> I agree with your change, but I'm not sure these should be pr_info() to > start with, these seem more like debugging messages? I can't see how > they'd be useful in standard operation so could we just convert them to be > debug instead?
Well it tells why the page recovery didn't work.
Memory recovery is a somewhat obscure path, so it's better to have full information.
-Andi
-- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
| |