lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Added backlight driver for Acer Aspire 4736
From
Date
於 四,2012-03-22 於 11:26 +0530,Pradeep Subrahmanion 提到:
> >From acer acpi ,I came to know that the 4730 series uses new wmi interface .
>
> http://code.google.com/p/aceracpi/wiki/SupportedHardware
>

I am not sure what is the WMIDv2, but it's not the current WMI v2 in
acer-wmi driver.

> Thanks ,
>
> Pradeep Subrahmanion
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:24 AM, joeyli <jlee@suse.com> wrote:
> > 於 四,2012-03-22 於 09:02 +0530,Pradeep Subrahmanion 提到:
> >> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 11:25 +0800, joeyli wrote:
> >> > 於 四,2012-03-22 於 08:03 +0530,Pradeep Subrahmanion 提到:
> >> > > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 09:33 +0800, joeyli wrote:
> >> > > > 於 四,2012-03-22 於 00:39 +0530,Pradeep Subrahmanion 提到:
> >> > > > > > This new patch should remove acpi_video0 interface on your machine.
> >> > > > > > Please kindly provide your dmidecode:
> >> > > > > > dmidecode > dmidecode.log
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > And,
> >> > > > > > please make should the patch really applied, you can do a bit change on
> >> > > > > > pr_info message by yourself.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Sorry . I think there was some mistake . I tried the patch again. Now
> >> > > > > I see only intel_backlight inside /sys/class/backlight. There is no
> >> > > > > acer-wmi interface . Is this the expected behavior ? . Or am I missing
> >> > > > > anything ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yes, this is the expected behavior! But, now I doubt your issue was
> >> > > > workaround by acpi_osi=Linux but not intel_backlight.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > echo 5 > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
> >> > > > > > > echo 5 > /sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight/brightness
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > But it doesn't make any change .
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > In my case , 'acpi_backlight = vendor' does not make any difference since the hot key control
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > already starts working with 'acpi_osi=Linux' option.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > cat /proc/cmdline gives ,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.3.0+
> >> > > > > > > root=UUID=f0197a59-c067-4fd8-ad90-c4d721816077 ro acpi_osi=Linux
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks ,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Pradeep Subrahmanion
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > OK, that's more clearly, please remove acpi_osi=Linux then re-test, I
> >> > > > > > think the hotkey of backlight control only works with acpi_osi=Linux ?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Does your backlight control still work if you remove acpi_osi=Linux ?
> >> > >
> >> > > If I remove acpi_osi=Linux , the hot key control stops working .
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > What is the preload OS in your machine when you bought it? Windows XP,
> >> > Vista or Windows 7?
> >>
> >> It was Windows XP.
> >>
> >
> > The WDDM driver didn't support by Windows XP, the brightness control on
> > XP should works with _BCM or OpRegion.
> >
> > Wonder how does brightness control work on XP with your machine.
> >
> > I will dig more in your dsdt...
> >
> >

Please kindly try acpi_osi="!Windows 2006", I think it also works to
you.


Thanks
Joey Lee

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-22 10:39    [W:0.070 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site