lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] scheduler: minor improvement to pick_next_highest_task_rt in linux-3.3

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 18:33 +0000, Michael J. Wang wrote:
> >
> > OK. Thanks. I was afraid the details were too verbose when the fix
> > was obvious to the experts. Anyways, I now know the format you
> > are expecting, so I will do better next time.
>
> Since you took the trouble to write it, I thought it worth the trouble
> to include.
>
> Very often Changelogs are way too spartan (my own included), I can't
> recall the amount of times I've kicked myself for leaving out some - at
> the time - obvious details.
>
> So I prefer people to go overboard a bit and err on the side
> of too much information :-)

Yeah. Current trends are: for every 1000 patches sent there's
maybe one patch that has a tad too much information in its
changelog - but instead offers good entertainment in the
changelog so it's still perfectly fine. 990 patches have too
little information. The remaining 9 are just fine.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-22 08:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans