lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] scheduler: minor improvement to pick_next_highest_task_rt in linux-3.3

    * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

    > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 18:33 +0000, Michael J. Wang wrote:
    > >
    > > OK. Thanks. I was afraid the details were too verbose when the fix
    > > was obvious to the experts. Anyways, I now know the format you
    > > are expecting, so I will do better next time.
    >
    > Since you took the trouble to write it, I thought it worth the trouble
    > to include.
    >
    > Very often Changelogs are way too spartan (my own included), I can't
    > recall the amount of times I've kicked myself for leaving out some - at
    > the time - obvious details.
    >
    > So I prefer people to go overboard a bit and err on the side
    > of too much information :-)

    Yeah. Current trends are: for every 1000 patches sent there's
    maybe one patch that has a tad too much information in its
    changelog - but instead offers good entertainment in the
    changelog so it's still perfectly fine. 990 patches have too
    little information. The remaining 9 are just fine.

    Thanks,

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-22 08:53    [W:0.029 / U:31.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site