Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:50:13 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] scheduler: minor improvement to pick_next_highest_task_rt in linux-3.3 |
| |
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 18:33 +0000, Michael J. Wang wrote: > > > > OK. Thanks. I was afraid the details were too verbose when the fix > > was obvious to the experts. Anyways, I now know the format you > > are expecting, so I will do better next time. > > Since you took the trouble to write it, I thought it worth the trouble > to include. > > Very often Changelogs are way too spartan (my own included), I can't > recall the amount of times I've kicked myself for leaving out some - at > the time - obvious details. > > So I prefer people to go overboard a bit and err on the side > of too much information :-)
Yeah. Current trends are: for every 1000 patches sent there's maybe one patch that has a tad too much information in its changelog - but instead offers good entertainment in the changelog so it's still perfectly fine. 990 patches have too little information. The remaining 9 are just fine.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |