lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 5/6] dt: Document Tegra20/30 pinctrl binding
On 03/21/2012 10:00 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:57:14PM +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/21/2012 03:19 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:44:38AM +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> Define a new binding for the Tegra pin controller, which is capable of
>>>> defining all aspects of desired pin multiplexing and pin configuration.
>>>> This is all based on the new common pinctrl bindings.
>>>>
>>>> Add Tegra30 binding based on Tegra20 binding.
...
>>>> +Example board file extract:
>>>> +
>>>> + pinctrl@70000000 {
>>>> + sdmmc4_default: pinmux {
>>>> + sdmmc4_clk_pcc4 {
>>>> + nvidia,pins = "sdmmc4_clk_pcc4",
>>>> + "sdmmc4_rst_n_pcc3";
>>>> + nvidia,function = "sdmmc4";
>>>> + nvidia,pull = <0>;
>>>> + nvidia,tristate = <0>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + sdmmc4_dat0_paa0 {
>>>> + nvidia,pins = "sdmmc4_dat0_paa0",
>>>> + "sdmmc4_dat1_paa1",
>>>> + "sdmmc4_dat2_paa2",
>>>> + "sdmmc4_dat3_paa3",
>>>> + "sdmmc4_dat4_paa4",
>>>> + "sdmmc4_dat5_paa5",
>>>> + "sdmmc4_dat6_paa6",
>>>> + "sdmmc4_dat7_paa7";
>>>> + nvidia,function = "sdmmc4";
>>>> + nvidia,pull = <2>;
>>>> + nvidia,tristate = <0>;
>>>
>>> It seems it does not support per pin config for tegra30 and we have to
>>> separate them in different nodes with same group config value, right?
>>
>> Sorry, I don't understand the question.
>
> I meant for tegra, the config(not mux) in one pinctrl node functions
> on all entities in nvidia,pins, IOW, all pin or group must have the
> same config.
> So we can not set them differently in one node.
>
> For example, considering if sdmmc4_dat0_paa0 is nvidia,pull <0>
> while sdmmc4_dat1_paa1 is nvidia,pull <1>.
> Then we need to separate them in different pinctrl nodes, right?

Yes, that's true.

However, note that you can have more than one node affecting a
particular pin or group if you want. For example, you could have one set
of nodes that sets the mux, another set of nodes that sets
pullup/down/none, another set that sets tristate/driven. That way,
within each set of nodes, you get to group together all pins with
similar properties. This is all because we take the list of affected
pins/groups from the nvidia,pins property, rather than e.g. the node
name, so it's possible to list the same pin/group in multiple nodes. An
example from the Tegra Harmony board file:

There's one node for each mux function that's used, specifying which
pins/groups it's used on:

ata {
pins = "ata";
function = "ide";
};
atb {
nvidia,pins = "atb", "gma", "gme";
nvidia,function = "sdio4";
};
... many other nodes for other functions
There's also one node for each combination of pull and tristate that's
used, specifying which pins/groups it's used on:

conf_ata {
nvidia,pins = "ata", "atb", "atc", "atd", "ate",
"cdev1", "dap1", "dtb", "gma", "gmb",
"gmc", "gmd", "gme", "gpu7", "gpv",
"i2cp", "pta", "rm", "slxa", "slxk",
"spia", "spib";
nvidia,pull = <0>;
nvidia,tristate = <0>;
};
... many other nodes for other pull/tristate combinations
I ran a script to group the various pins into nodes in different ways,
and this particular combination seemed to generate the smallest device
tree source file for Harmony.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-22 16:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans