Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:32:59 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] VMUFAT filesystem [2/4] | From | Adrian McMenamin <> |
| |
On 21 March 2012 13:37, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
...
OK, points essentially taken and will push through another patch in due course ... just a couple of points, though:
* Did the defensive stuff because bad guys might inject evil code rather than because I thought in normal run of execution there would be an issue - guess I just have to forget that?
* On the semaphore - what should I use? Uninterruptible? Spinlock? Aren't there big downsides to them also?
| |