[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RESUBMIT] [PATCH] Use BIOS Keyboard variable to set Numlock
    2012/3/1 H. Peter Anvin <>:
    > Sorry, you can't put non-x86 code in arch/x86.  There are two way to
    > distribute this kind of stuff into arch directories:
    > 1. You can define an ARCH_ symbol which indicates that <asm/kbdleds.h> is
    > available; otherwise use the fallback routine;
    > 2. You can define it in a .c file as an actual function in the affected
    > architectures (x86 and parisc here) and then define it as a weak symbol
    > (grep for __weak) in the common code.
    > If you don't want to bite off this distribution I can understand it
    > (although it's not up to me, technically, since I'm not the maintainer of
    > the vt subsystem) but if so leave this as an inline in a common place.
    >        -hpa

    I thought about your idea for separating the platform specific code in
    another file. It will make the code more modular but at the end we're
    talking about a single function that flips a single bit. I really
    don't see any real benefit from defining it in a separate file. It
    makes (from my point of view) reading the file just more difficult.
    That's why I decided to return the platform specific code back where
    it originally was and only modifiy the x86 code. So I can keep the
    changes at minimum. I'll post the patch later today and cc the tty
    maintainer. Thanks for the help and the ideas.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-02 18:55    [W:0.021 / U:4.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site