[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa
    On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:39:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:04 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > > In implementation terms the scheduler is simplified and it won't work
    > > as well as it should with massive CPU overcommit. But I had to take
    > > shortcuts to keep the complexity down to O(N) where N is the number of
    > > CPUS
    > Yeah I saw that, you essentially put a nr_cpus loop inside schedule(),
    > obviously that's not going to ever happen.

    lol Would be fun if such a simplification would still perform better
    than your code :).

    Yeah I'll try to fix that but it's massively complex and frankly
    benchmarking wise it won't help much fixing that... so it's beyond the
    end of my todo list.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-19 15:25    [W:0.018 / U:54.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site