[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] Drivers: hv: Support the newly introduced KVP messages in the driver
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:36:16PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> Dan,
> Sorry I could not get back to you earlier. You are right, in that I am trusting
> the host! I am of the firm belief that in a virtualized environment, if you don't trust
> the host, there is not a whole lot you can do in a guest! I have had this arguments
> with other on this mailing list in the past. Having said that, I think we have spent more
> time debating this than we should; your proposal is reasonable and I will go ahead and
> re-spin those patches based on your comments. I should be posting them shortly.
> Regards,

It's not about trusting the host or not trusting the host. It's
about "if you're going to specify a limitter, it can't be off by one
even if you don't expect to hit the limit".

But thanks for redoing these.

dan carpenter

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-16 06:39    [W:0.089 / U:2.004 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site