lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: cpu_active vs pcrypt & padata
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:13:08 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Also, wth is all this kernel/padata.c stuff? There's next to no useful
> comment in there and the only consumer seems to be pcrypt, does that
> really need to be in kernel/ ?

FWIW I wrote that stuff up when it went in...

https://lwn.net/Articles/382257/

Might be helpful in case anybody else thinks they might want to use this
facility. Maybe.

jon


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-16 14:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans