lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: cpu_active vs pcrypt & padata
    Hi.

    On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:13:08AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > Hi Steffen,
    >
    > I found cpu_active usage in crypto/pcrypt.c and was wondering what
    > that's doing there. I would really like to contain that thing to as
    > narrow a piece of kernel as I possible can (sched/cpuset/hotplug) but it
    > appears to be spreading.

    pcrypt uses cpu_active to tell padata which cpuset it whishes
    to use for parallelization. I could try to push the cpumask
    handling down to padata if you want to limit this to the core
    kernel.

    >
    > Also, wth is all this kernel/padata.c stuff? There's next to no useful
    > comment in there and the only consumer seems to be pcrypt, does that
    > really need to be in kernel/ ?

    The padata code is generic and not limited to crypto, you can find
    a documentation at Documentation/padata.txt.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-16 11:47    [W:0.020 / U:369.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site