[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: Suggest pr_<level> over printk(KERN_<LEVEL>
    On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:05:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
    > Patchwork queues are pretty useless when patches entered
    > do not have their status updated for long periods.
    > The patch I sent in August 2011 shows "new" rather than
    > have an appropriate status.
    > If you actually use patchwork, though it seems you don't,
    > I think you should just mark every patch that's new as
    > rejected and start over.

    I use it, but not in the way you think I should be using it. Your not
    getting to your will on other kernel developers is what this thread is
    all all about, ultimately.

    I don't get to work on ext4 full time, and so every minute I put on it
    has to not a be a waste of time. This includes updating status
    messages for patches that aren't obviously not applicable, or
    superceded, but rather something that I might get to look at later.

    - Ted

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-14 14:47    [W:0.020 / U:100.948 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site