[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: Suggest pr_<level> over printk(KERN_<LEVEL>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:05:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Patchwork queues are pretty useless when patches entered
> do not have their status updated for long periods.
> The patch I sent in August 2011 shows "new" rather than
> have an appropriate status.
> If you actually use patchwork, though it seems you don't,
> I think you should just mark every patch that's new as
> rejected and start over.

I use it, but not in the way you think I should be using it. Your not
getting to your will on other kernel developers is what this thread is
all all about, ultimately.

I don't get to work on ext4 full time, and so every minute I put on it
has to not a be a waste of time. This includes updating status
messages for patches that aren't obviously not applicable, or
superceded, but rather something that I might get to look at later.

- Ted

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-14 14:47    [W:0.028 / U:77.396 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site