lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: add relation of recommended frequency.
    Date
    On Monday, March 12, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
    > 2012/3/11 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
    > > On Wednesday, March 07, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
    > >> The semantics of "target frequency" given to devfreq driver from
    > >> devfreq framework has always been interpretted as "at least" or GLB
    > >> (greatest lower bound). However, the framework might want the
    > >> device driver to limit its max frequency (LUB: least upper bound),
    > >> especially if it is given by thermal framework (it's too hot).
    > >>
    > >> Thus, the target fuction should have another parameter to express
    > >> whether the framework wants GLB or LUB. And, the additional parameter,
    > >> "u32 options", does it.
    > >>
    > >> With the update, devfreq_recommended_opp() is also updated.
    > >>
    > >> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
    > >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
    > >
    > > This one looks good.
    > >
    > > Do you want me to take it as a patch, or to pull it from your tree?
    > >
    > > Rafael
    >
    > Hello Rafael,
    >
    >
    > Please pull it from the tree
    > (http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/devfreq-for-next)
    > as the change log has been corrected.
    >
    > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung devfreq-for-next

    I'm not happy with the "PM / devfreq: add PM QoS support" commit, however.

    I believe I explained the reason why in a separate message sent a couple of
    days ago.

    Thanks,
    Rafael


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-13 00:45    [W:0.037 / U:1.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site