lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] power: max17042_battery: Add DT bindings
Hi All,

On 03/11/2012 06:53 PM, 함명주 wrote:
> Karol Lewandowski<k.lewandowsk@samsung.com>, 2012-03-10 02:32 (GMT+09:00)
>> Dear MungJoo,
>>
>> I wasn't aware of Dirk's patchset and thus, I didn't ever try to make my
>> patches compatible with it.
>>
>> I've found hopefully correct patchset[1] via google - it's mailing list
>> posting without any feedback... I've checked linux-next and it clearly
>> hasn't been merged.
>>
>> I'm happy to rework my patch but I would like to ask you about specific
>> tree I should base on. Is this patchset in some subsystem-specific
>> (power?) tree? Other?
>
> Dear Karol,
>
> I preferred Dirk's patchset included because it is for the correctness of the device driver.
>
> However, as Dirk's patchset has not been updated or merged for long, I guess you may go ahead trying to merge this DT patchset first.
>

My patch set was updated on 24/1/12 and has all my changes to date. I am not
sure why it
has not been merged Anton, David?


> It appears that this patchset does not force much trouble for Dirk's side as the two are virtually disjoint and it seems rebasing Dirk's patchset upon this patchset trivial though I didn't try that yet.
>
Agreed, I would like to see my patches make the 3.4 though since they have been
out for a while

> Anyway, please consider "Acked-by" from me for the patches.
>
>
> Cheers!
> MyungJoo.
>
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/24/237
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Karol Lewandowski | Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux/Platform
>>
>> On 09.03.2012 01:16, 함명주 wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Karol Lewandowski,
>>>
>>> I've been confused this patchset with Dirk Brandewie's MAX17042 patchset; I though this was a follow-up version of Dirk's, which I think already acked by me.
>>>
>>> Anyway, the patches themselves look fine.
>>>
>>> However, have you checked the compatibility (mergability?) with the recent MAX17042 patches of Dirk Brandewie? I'm not sure about the merge status of Dirk's patchset, but, I think you need to consider his patches as they massively reshaped the device driver.
>>>
>>> Other than that, the patches look fine. (If that issue is already considered, regard this as an Acked-by.)
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> MyungJoo.
>>>
>>> ------- Original Message -------
>>> Sender : Karol Lewandowski Junior Software Engineer/SPRC-Linux (MSD)/삼성전자
>>> Date : 2012-03-08 19:32 (GMT+09:00)
>>> Title : Re: [PATCH 0/3] power: max17042_battery: Add DT bindings
>>>
>>> Dear MyungJoo Ham,
>>>
>>> Could you take a look at patchset I've sent? It's needed to make use of
>>> max17042 driver on device tree-enabled platforms.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> MyungJoo Ham (함명주), PHD
>
> System S/W Lab, S/W Platform Team, Software Center
> Samsung Electronics
> Cell: +82-10-6714-2858
>
>
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-12 15:37    [W:0.604 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site