Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:44:46 +0400 | From | Konstantin Khlebnikov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume |
| |
Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra<a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:54 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> I do agree that reverting is probably safer at this point, but can we >>> get agreement on this? >> >> I agree with reverting, shoot it in the head :-) Do you want a git >> thingy? > > Well, it's less a "git thingy" and more that there are tons of people > involved with the original commit that haven't even piped up. > > Srivatsa, Ingo, Prashanth.. > > In fact, I notice that Prashanth doesn't even seem to have been cc'd, > even if he's the original reporter of the commit that gets reverted. > Added (see lkml)
I forget to mention my kernel boot options. I live with them for a while, so I just forget about it. "debug threadirqs i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.i915_enable_fbc=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1 crashkernel=128M"
So, "threadirqs" is a lost piece of the puzzle -- without it I cannot reproduce the bug. However, I have no idea how this is connected to sched-domains. =)
(Add Thomas Gleixner to CC)
| |