Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:38:56 +0100 | From | Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA |
| |
On 16:38 Sat 10 Mar , Alan Ott wrote: > Not all at91 chips have PATA, this parameter will identify which > chips do. The determining of which chips support PATA was done > by Arnd Bergmann. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us> > CC: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> > --- > arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET > config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET > bool > > +config AT91_HAS_PATA > + bool what is the need for this?
As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT
Best Regards, J.
| |