lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA
On 16:38 Sat 10 Mar     , Alan Ott wrote:
> Not all at91 chips have PATA, this parameter will identify which
> chips do. The determining of which chips support PATA was done
> by Arnd Bergmann.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us>
> CC: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET
> config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET
> bool
>
> +config AT91_HAS_PATA
> + bool
what is the need for this?

As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore
if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT

Best Regards,
J.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-11 19:53    [W:0.068 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site