lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/10] af_unix: add multicast and filtering features to AF_UNIX
    Hi
    Have you considered using TIPC instead?
    It already provides multicast messaging with guaranteed ordering, and reliable delivery (SOCK _RDM)

    //E


    --Original message---
    Sender: "netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org" <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
    Sent time: Thu Mar 01 14:56:00 CET 2012
    To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
    Cc: rodrigo.moya@collabora.co.uk, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, davem@davemloft.net, javier@collabora.co.uk, lennart@poettering.net, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, alban.crequy@collabora.co.uk, bart.cerneels@collabora.co.uk, sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] af_unix: add multicast and filtering features to AF_UNIX

    On 03/01/2012 01:59 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
    > Le jeudi 01 mars 2012 à 13:50 +0100, Rodrigo Moya a écrit :
    >> the main problem in D-Bus we are trying to solve is the context
    >> switches, since right now, there is a daemon, which listens on a UNIX
    >> socket, and all traffic in the bus goes through it, and then the daemon
    >> has to route the messages it gets on that socket to the corresponding
    >> place(s). So, every time someone sends a message to D-Bus, since all
    >> traffic goes through the daemon, dbus-daemon gets waked-up, which is one
    >> of the biggest bottlenecks we are trying to fix.
    >>
    >> That's why we are thinking about using multicast with socket filters, so
    >> that the daemon only gets traffic it cares about and thus is not waked
    >> up and context switches don't happen when not needed.
    >>
    >> Using message queues, AFAICS, we would have the same problem, as the
    >> daemon would create the message queue and would get all traffic, right?
    >>
    >
    > This is why I mentioned extensions.


    >
    > Anyway, if you think multicast sockets is the way to go, then you could
    > setup a virtual network just to be able to use AF_INET multicast.
    >
    > Thats probably doable without kernel patching.
    >

    We could use AF_INET multicast on a local machine but we need some
    ordering and control flow requirements that are not guaranteed on UDP
    multicast over IP. That's why we thought to add a new address family
    AF_MCAST.

    To make it a general local multicast solution and not being too specific
    we added some flags to control its behavior like
    MCAST_MREQ_DROP_WHEN_FULL to decide to either block the sender or drop
    the packet when one receiver has its queue full.

    Regards,
    Javier
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html--
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-01 15:29    [W:0.046 / U:0.160 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site