[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: network regression: cannot rename netdev twice
    On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:50:15 +0100, Kay Sievers said:

    > After years of working in that area I will stop to work on these hacks
    > to promise stable ethX names. It was just wrong, like enumerations
    > always are in hotplug setups.

    So (real world case) I've got a server that's got a 1G ethernet connected to
    the public net, a 1G ethernet that's a cluster management network, and
    a 10G ethernet that connects to our HPC clusters.

    And I want to add iptables rules that distinguish based on interface. Currently
    I can nail the management net to eth0, the public net to eth1, and the 10G to
    eth2, and then just add "-i eth1" or whatever in the iptables ruleset.

    I really don't care if the 0/1/2 move around - but if we're not having nailed-down
    interface names, what will take the place of '-i ethN' in iptables?

    > People who need predictable interface names should just manually
    > configure custom/descriptive names, or names which are reliably
    > derived from the hardware, like firmware-provided names or the pci
    > slot number.

    Or is this sort of thing in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
    SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:0b:f2:80", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
    what you are trying to move to, and my systems are already onboard and
    I should just move along, nothing to see here? ;)
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-08 07:45    [W:0.021 / U:7.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site