lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock
On 02/06, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> Grabbing tasklist_lock has its disadvantages, i.e. it blocks
> process creation and destruction. If there are lots of processes,
> blocking doesn't sound as a great idea.
>
> For LMK, it is sufficient to surround tasks list traverse with
> rcu_read_{,un}lock().
>
> From now on using force_sig() is not safe, as it can race with an
> already exiting task, so we use send_sig() now. As a downside, it
> won't kill PID namespace init processes, but that's not what we
> want anyway.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-08 16:41    [W:0.130 / U:4.932 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site