lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ptrace: add ability to get clear_tid_address
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:15:07PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 08:56 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:07:38PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> >> On 02/03/2012 04:51 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>> On 02/03, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >>>> Because there's no need for current to get this value of himself, but can
> >>>> be useful for e.g. gdb.
> >>>
> >>> OK, perhaps this makes sense, I do not know.
> >>>
> >>> Jan, Pedro, do you think gdb can use PTRACE_GET_TID_ADDRESS (returns
> >>> tracee->clear_child_tid) ?
> >>
> >> Off hand, I'm not picturing a use. But that may well just mean I'm lacking
> >> imagination. Andrew, Pavel, did you have a particular idea in mind when you
> >> said it may be useful for debugging a multithreading program / gdb?
> >>
> >
> > Might not we set up hw watchpoint on this address and get interrupt
> > before pthread-join will find it? (To be fair I'm not sure if such
> > trick will work, didn't test ;)
>
> For a debugger wanting to know when a pthread_join was about to return?
> Might be simpler to put a breakpoint (or stap probe, or some such) inside
> pthread_join.

Yes, could be, but it means you have to install pthread debug libs, right?
(have no idea actually since I personally use debug printing instead of
breakpoints).

> It's the kernel that writes to this address, so I've no
> idea if the watchpoint trap ends up visible on userspace. Which thread
> would it be reported to, given that this is cleared when the child
> is gone, I have no idea either.

Yeah, need some help from someone who wrote hw-breakpoints support in
kernel (i don't remember the details).

Cyrill


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-07 22:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site