Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Barry Song <> | | Date | Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:34:02 +0800 | | Subject | Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCHv23 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator |
| |
Michal,
2012/2/29 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:35:42 +0100, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2012/2/23 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>: >> >>> This is (yet another) quick update of CMA patches. I've rebased them >>> onto next-20120222 tree from >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git and >>> fixed the bug pointed by Aaro Koskinen. >> >> >> For the whole series: >> >> Tested-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com> >> >> and i also write a simple kernel helper to test the CMA: > > > Would it make sense to make a patch out of it putting it to tools/cma (or > similar)?
i can send a patch for this. i am just thinking, should it be placed in tools/ as a test utility or Documents/ as an example to explain CMA to users who want to use cma. i also think we should have a seperate document to explain cma in details in documents/, and my helper program can be placed there.
how do you think? > > -- > Best regards, _ _ > .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o > ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) > ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
thanks barry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |