lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kvm: notify host when guest paniced
At 02/29/2012 06:08 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 12:05 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:00:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 02/29/2012 11:55 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How about using a virtio-serial channel for this? You can transfer any
>>>>> amount of information (including the dump itself).
>>>>>
>>>> Isn't it unreliable after the guest panicked?
>>>
>>> So is calling hypercalls, or dumping, or writing to the screen. Of
>>> course calling a hypercall is simpler and so is more reliable.
>>>
>> Yes, crash can be so severe that it is not even detected by a kernel
>> itself, so not OOPS message even printed. But in most cases if kernel is
>> functional enough to print OOPS it is functional enough to call single
>> hypercall instruction.
>
> Why not print the oops to virtio-serial? Or even just a regular serial
> port? That's what bare metal does.

If virtio-serial's driver has bug or the guest doesn't have such device...

>
>>>> Having special kdump
>>>> kernel that transfers dump to a host via virtio-serial channel though
>>>> sounds interesting. May be that's what you mean.
>>>
>>> Yes. The "panic, starting dump" signal should be initiated by the
>>> panicking kernel though, in case the dump fails.
>>>
>> Then panic hypercall sounds like a reasonable solution.
>
> It is, but I'm trying to see if we can get away with doing nothing.
>

If we have a reliable way with doing nothing, it is better. But I donot
find such way.

Thanks
Wen Congyang



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-29 11:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans