[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Extend mwait idle to optimize away CAL and RES interrupts to an idle CPU -v1
    [ Resending without the ugly email client formatting ]

    On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
    > * Venkatesh Pallipadi <> wrote:
    >> * Do we need some accounting for these wakeups exported for powertop?
    > If then tracepoints.
    >> * We can also eliminate TS_POLLING flag in favor of this. But, that will have
    >>   a lot more touchpoints and better done as a standlone change.
    > Should most definitely be done for this series to be acceptble -
    > as a preparatory patch in the series, with the feature at the
    > end of the series.
    OK. Will look at TS_POLLING part and likely include it in the next resend.

    >> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(atomic_t *, idle_task_ti_flags);
    > That's ugly, we should access the idle task's ti flags directly.
    > To have efficient percpu access to the idle threads another
    > clean-up is needed: we should turn idle_thread_array into a
    > full-structure PER_CPU area.
    > For that we need a small variant of fork_idle(), which does not
    > dup the init thread - pretty trivial.
    > fork_idle() should also make sure it does not schedule the child
    > thread: thus we'd also be able to further simplify smpboot.c and
    > get rid of all that extremely ugly 'struct create_idle'
    > gymnastics in smpboot.c.

    Hmm. Not being very familiar with that code, I will have to take a closer
    look at this potential cleanup...


    > Thanks,
    >        Ingo
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-23 21:05    [W:0.023 / U:5.376 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site