[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport
    On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:41 PM,  <> wrote:
    > The patchset is simply made of:
    > be98c2cdb15ba26148cd2bd58a857d4f7759ed38 (unmodified)
    > 5b1cbac37798805c1fee18c8cebe5c0a13975b17 (")
    > c38e23456278e967f094b08247ffc3711b1029b2 (")
    > 15d8791cae75dca27bfda8ecfe87dca9379d6bb0 (")
    > b6c66418dcad0fcf83cd1d0a39482db37bf4fc41 (")
    > 6d59d7a9f5b723a7ac1925c136e93ec83c0c3043 (")
    > b3b0870ef3ffed72b92415423da864f440f57ad6 (")
    > 4903062b5485f0e2c286a23b44c9b59d9b017d53: this one requires a slight
    > modification:
    > -#define safe_address (kstat_cpu(0).cpustat.user)
    > instead of:
    > -#define safe_address (__get_cpu_var(kernel_cpustat).cpustat[CPUTIME_USER])
    > f94edacf998516ac9d849f7bc6949a703977a7f3 (unmodified)
    > 34ddc81a230b15c0e345b6b253049db731499f7e (")

    Oh, Greg, since that series is tested by Raphael on top of 3.2.6
    already, let's just make that be the stable backport.

    It does mean that the stable backport will contain that whole "rip out
    fp state preloading and reimplement it" thing, but hey, considering
    that when I tried to avoid it I clearly screwed something up, maybe
    that's all for the best. And perhaps staying closer to the development
    tree is a good idea anyway in case there are any other issues.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-23 04:41    [W:0.025 / U:0.296 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site