Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:25:03 +0100 | | From | Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] ARM: at91/at91x40: remove use of at91_sys_read/write |
| |
On 09:22 Thu 23 Feb , Ryan Mallon wrote: > On 22/02/12 20:39, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40_time.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- > > arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91x40.h | 18 +++++++++--------- > > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c > > index 0154b7f..5400a1d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c > > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static void at91x40_idle(void) > > * Disable the processor clock. The processor will be automatically > > * re-enabled by an interrupt or by a reset. > > */ > > - at91_sys_write(AT91_PS_CR, AT91_PS_CR_CPU); > > + __raw_writel(AT91_PS_CR_CPU, AT91_PS_CR); > > > This doesn't seem to be equivalent, at91_sys_write does: > > void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)AT91_VA_BASE_SYS; > __raw_writel(value, addr + reg_offset); > > and this patch doesn't redefine AT91_PS_CR. Was it broken before this > patch? What am I missing? this is right #define AT91_PS_CR (AT91_PS + 0) /* PS Control register */ Best Regards, J.
|  |