[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups + docs
On 02/22/2012 06:56 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> maybe even a "very_likely()", but then keep a static_branch()
>> or whatever for those cases you do not want to optimize at
>> compile time.
> Once such uses arise maybe we could add such an 'unbiased'
> variant.

We already have such use cases, although a lot of them are covered by
static_cpu_has(). However, I fully expect that we'll have cases that
aren't readily covered by CPU feature flags and I'd like to avoid
reinventing new features.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-22 16:15    [W:0.116 / U:0.604 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site