[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups + docs

    * Steven Rostedt <> wrote:

    > I like the blue shed, but anyway...
    > On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 09:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > * H. Peter Anvin <> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Not arguing that, but the static aspect is still key... or
    > > > people will read it as another version of likely/unlikely.
    > >
    > > They can *read* it as such, that as is very much intentional!
    > I mentioned this thread on irc and the first comment I received was:
    > "is that a new attempt at trying to guide the compiler?"

    It essentially is, implemented partly via compiler help,
    combined with runtime code patching, as an extended run-time arm
    of the compiler in essence, to make out of line slowpaths even
    cheaper to have around - to make the fast-path even faster.

    > I personally find the very_unlikely() confusing, but then
    > again I like the blue shed over the pink one.

    Confusing in what way?



     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-22 14:37    [W:0.022 / U:0.392 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site