[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] i387: support lazy restore of FPU state
    On 02/20/2012 06:18 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >> Although I do wonder if we should just make kernel_fpu_begin() be a
    >> real function instead of inlining it. I'm not sure it makes sense to
    >> inline that thing, and it might be better to export that one instead.
    > I do think that would be better in the long run, but for now here's an
    > updated "trivial" patch to fix it.

    There is actually another very good reason for out-of-lining
    kernel_fpu_begin/_end: it will act as a compiler barrier i we ever do
    compiler-generated SSE or AVX code, which we may very well want to do.

    In fact, there may even be good reason for something like:

    kernel_fpu_use(void (*func)(void *), void *arg);

    ... where the FPU-using stuff is actively embedded in the call.


    H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
    I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-21 03:35    [W:0.019 / U:14.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site