lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 04/20] pinctrl: Record a pin owner, not mux function, when requesting pins
From
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> wrote:

> When pins are requested/acquired/got, some device becomes the owner of
> their mux setting. At this point, it isn't certain which mux function
> will be selected for the pin, since this may vary between each of the
> device's states in the pinctrl mapping table. As such, we should record
> the owning device, not what we think the initial mux setting will be,
> when requesting pins.
>
> This doesn't make a lot of difference right now since pinctrl_get gets
> only one single device/state combination, but this will make a difference
> when pinctrl_get gets all states, and pinctrl_select_state can switch
> between states.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

Mostly a rename then, OK...

> @@ -66,19 +65,14 @@ static int pin_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>                goto out;
>        }
>
> -       if (!function) {
> -               dev_err(pctldev->dev, "no function name given\n");
> -               return -EINVAL;
> -       }
> -

Why should it be allowed to have a NULL owner? There is a
debug print involving it above but ... maybe this is over-cautious?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-20 22:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans