Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible
From
Peter Zijlstra <>
Date
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:07:46 +0100
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:14 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Enabling SD_BALANCE_WAKE used to be decidedly too expensive to consider. > Maybe that has changed, but I doubt it.
Right, I through I remembered some such, you could see it on wakeup heavy things like pipe-bench and that java msg passing thing, right?