Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:40:44 +0900 | | From | Takuya Yoshikawa <> | | Subject | Re: [test result] dirty logging without srcu update -- Re: [RFC][PATCH] srcu: Implement call_srcu() |
| |
(2012/02/02 19:21), Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >> I used "unsigned int" just because I wanted to use the current >> atomic_clear_mask() as is. >> >> We need to implement atomic_clear_mask_long() or use ... > > If we use cmpxchg8b/cmpxchg16b then this won't fit with the > atomic_*_long family. >
OK, I will try.
I have one concern about correctness issue though:
concurrent rmap write protection may not be safe due to delayed tlb flush ... cannot happen?
Takuya
|  |