lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] MTD: UBI: wire up checkpointing
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:06:46 +0100 Richard Weinberger <rw@linutronix.de> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_UBI_CHECKPOINT
> +static int attach_by_checkpointing(struct ubi_device *ubi)
> +{
> + int cp_start, err;
> + struct ubi_scan_info *si;
> +
> + cp_start = ubi_find_checkpoint(ubi);
> + if (cp_start < 0)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + si = ubi_read_checkpoint(ubi, cp_start);
> + if (IS_ERR(si))
> + return PTR_ERR(si);
> +
> + ubi->bad_peb_count = 0;
> + ubi->good_peb_count = ubi->peb_count;

Zero reported bad PEBs when checkpointing.
Seems that checkpointing does not remember number/location of bad PEBs.
Are we fine with that?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_UBI_CHECKPOINT
> + err = attach_by_checkpointing(ubi);
> +
> + if (err) {
> + if (err != -ENOENT)
> + ubi_msg("falling back to attach by scanning mode!\n");
> +
> + err = attach_by_scanning(ubi);
> + }

Code does not fit error message.
Message states "falling back to scanning" only if "err != -ENOENT".
However code calls 'attach_by_scanning' regardless 'err'.
Was it your intention?

Regards,
Shmulik


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-19 15:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans