[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/3] fadvise: implement POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE
On 2/16/12 10:57 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:

> Maybe we should try to push ...something... in the memcg code for the
> short-term future, make it as much generic as possible, and for the
> long-term try to reuse the same feature (totally or in part) in the
> per-fd approach via fadvise().

Yes - the two approaches are complementary and we should probably pursue

There are a number of apps which are already using fadvise though:

and probably many other similar cases that are not open source.

Some of these apps may be better off using NOREUSE instead of DONTNEED,
since they may not have a clue on what else is going on in the system.

The way I think about it: NOREUSE is a statement about what my process
is doing and DONTNEED is a statement about the entire system.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-16 20:11    [W:0.036 / U:8.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site