lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: quirk print dev name with duration
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:43 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:35 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:14 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > >> So could find out which device is involved with the calling
>> > > []
>> > >> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> > >> @@ -2854,14 +2854,15 @@ static void do_one_fixup_debug(void (*fn
>> > >>       ktime_t calltime, delta, rettime;
>> > >>       unsigned long long duration;
>> > >>
>> > >> -     printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling  %pF @ %i\n", fn, task_pid_nr(current));
>> > >> +     printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling  %pF @ %i for %s\n",
>> > >> +                     fn, task_pid_nr(current), dev_name(&dev->dev));
>> > >
>> > > Might be better to use dev_dbg
>> > >
>> > >        dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "calling %pF @ %i\n", fn, task_pid_nr(current));
>> > >
>> > > []
>> > >
>> > >> -     printk(KERN_DEBUG "pci fixup %pF returned after %lld usecs\n", fn,
>> > >> -             duration);
>> > >> +     printk(KERN_DEBUG "pci fixup %pF returned after %lld usecs for %s\n",
>> > >> +                     fn, duration, dev_name(&dev->dev));
>> > >
>> > >        dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "pci fixup %pF returned after %llu usecs\n",
>> > >                fn, duration);
>> > Not sure if that is going to break Arjan 's tool that analyze the boot time.
>> That depends on the tool code.
> []
>> Do you have a link to the tool?
>
> That tool would be scripts/bootgraph.pl and using
> dev_dbg would break it unless it's adapted to the
> change.  Your change seems fine for now.

Since we're adding new functionality (analyzing quirk durations), I
think it would be fair game to update the tool at the same time so it
could parse the dev_dbg() format.

For things related specifically to a device, we have a pretty good
record of trying to use dev_*() consistently, so I do have a
preference for continuing that.

If you do change, remember that dev_dbg() is different from
printk(KERN_DEBUG) in that printk(KERN_DEBUG) is always compiled-in
and always goes to the dmesg, but dev_dbg() is only compiled in when
DEBUG is defined, so dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) would be a more direct
replacement for printk(KERN_DEBUG).

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-16 18:51    [W:0.047 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site