Messages in this thread | | | From | Bjorn Helgaas <> | Date | Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:49:00 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: quirk print dev name with duration |
| |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:43 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:35 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: >> > > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:14 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> > >> So could find out which device is involved with the calling >> > > [] >> > >> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c >> > >> @@ -2854,14 +2854,15 @@ static void do_one_fixup_debug(void (*fn >> > >> ktime_t calltime, delta, rettime; >> > >> unsigned long long duration; >> > >> >> > >> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling %pF @ %i\n", fn, task_pid_nr(current)); >> > >> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling %pF @ %i for %s\n", >> > >> + fn, task_pid_nr(current), dev_name(&dev->dev)); >> > > >> > > Might be better to use dev_dbg >> > > >> > > dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "calling %pF @ %i\n", fn, task_pid_nr(current)); >> > > >> > > [] >> > > >> > >> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "pci fixup %pF returned after %lld usecs\n", fn, >> > >> - duration); >> > >> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "pci fixup %pF returned after %lld usecs for %s\n", >> > >> + fn, duration, dev_name(&dev->dev)); >> > > >> > > dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "pci fixup %pF returned after %llu usecs\n", >> > > fn, duration); >> > Not sure if that is going to break Arjan 's tool that analyze the boot time. >> That depends on the tool code. > [] >> Do you have a link to the tool? > > That tool would be scripts/bootgraph.pl and using > dev_dbg would break it unless it's adapted to the > change. Your change seems fine for now.
Since we're adding new functionality (analyzing quirk durations), I think it would be fair game to update the tool at the same time so it could parse the dev_dbg() format.
For things related specifically to a device, we have a pretty good record of trying to use dev_*() consistently, so I do have a preference for continuing that.
If you do change, remember that dev_dbg() is different from printk(KERN_DEBUG) in that printk(KERN_DEBUG) is always compiled-in and always goes to the dmesg, but dev_dbg() is only compiled in when DEBUG is defined, so dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) would be a more direct replacement for printk(KERN_DEBUG).
Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |