[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/3] fadvise: implement POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE
    On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 06:10:28PM -0800, Arun Sharma wrote:
    > On 2/15/12 4:56 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
    > >Oh sorry, you're right! nocache_tree is not a pointer inside
    > >address_space, so the compiler must know the size.
    > >
    > >mmh... move the definition of the rb_root struct in linux/types.h? or
    > >simply use a rb_root pointer. The (void *) looks a bit scary and too bug
    > >prone.
    > Either way is fine. I did some black box testing of the patch
    > (comparing noreuse vs dontneed) and it behaves as expected.
    > On a file copy, neither one pollutes the page cache. But if I run a
    > random read benchmark on the source file right before and
    > afterwards, page cache is warm with noreuse, but cold with dontneed.
    > Copy performance was unaffected.
    > I can't really comment on the implementation details since I haven't
    > reviewed it, but the functionality sounds useful.
    > -Arun

    Arun, thank you very much for your review and testing. Probably we'll
    move to a different, memcg-based solution, so I don't think I'll post
    another version of this patch set as is. In case, I'll apply one of
    the workarounds for the rb_root attribute.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-16 11:41    [W:0.020 / U:32.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site