[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Scheduler idle notifiers and users
    On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 14:31 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
    > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:01 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > >
    > > Thing is, the scheduler doesn't care about completion, all it needs is
    > > to be able to kick-start the thing atomically. So you really have to
    > > wait for it or can you do an interrupt driven state machine?
    > Or the scheduler callback could schedule a wq to do the job ?

    That'll end up being very ugly due to lock inversion etc. If we can get
    out of this using self-IPIs I'd much prefer that.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-16 11:17    [W:0.021 / U:6.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site