[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/rcu: Add _rcuidle() tracepoint to handle rcu_idle_exit() tracepoints
    On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 19:09 +0100, Witold Baryluk wrote:
    > Hi,
    > I have some problem with cpuidle tracing:
    > so I applied 3 patches from
    > > Steven Rostedt (3):
    > > tracing/rcu: Add trace_##name##__rcuidle() static tracepoint for inside rcu_idle_exit() sections
    > > x86/tracing: Denote the power and cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
    > > cpuidle/tracing: Denote the tracepoints as being in rcu_idle_exit() section
    > All 3 patches applied cleanly but for unknown reasons to me compilation fails:

    Yeah, my testing hit this issue and I fixed it up. I pushed out my
    patches to Ingo that have passed all my tests. You can get them here:

    You only need to apply patches 3,4 and 5.

    -- Steve

    > CC arch/x86/kernel/process.o
    > arch/x86/kernel/process.c: In function ‘default_idle’:
    > arch/x86/kernel/process.c:380:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_power_start_rcuidle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    > arch/x86/kernel/process.c:394:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_power_end_rcuidle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-15 20:19    [W:0.022 / U:59.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site