[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/rcu: Add _rcuidle() tracepoint to handle rcu_idle_exit() tracepoints
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 19:09 +0100, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some problem with cpuidle tracing:
> so I applied 3 patches from
> > Steven Rostedt (3):
> > tracing/rcu: Add trace_##name##__rcuidle() static tracepoint for inside rcu_idle_exit() sections
> > x86/tracing: Denote the power and cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
> > cpuidle/tracing: Denote the tracepoints as being in rcu_idle_exit() section
> All 3 patches applied cleanly but for unknown reasons to me compilation fails:

Yeah, my testing hit this issue and I fixed it up. I pushed out my
patches to Ingo that have passed all my tests. You can get them here:

You only need to apply patches 3,4 and 5.

-- Steve

> CC arch/x86/kernel/process.o
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c: In function ‘default_idle’:
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:380:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_power_start_rcuidle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:394:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_power_end_rcuidle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-15 20:19    [W:0.026 / U:5.180 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site