| From | Matt Fleming <> | Subject | [PATCH 21/40] OpenRISC: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv() | Date | Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:40:54 +0000 |
| |
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call it. This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the code was to modify sighand->action[] directly.
As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on signal delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> --- arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c | 4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c index 95207ab..53741ba 100644 --- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c @@ -250,9 +250,7 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, return; give_sigsegv: - if (sig == SIGSEGV) - ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL; - force_sig(SIGSEGV, current); + force_sigsegv(sig, current); } static inline void -- 1.7.4.4
|