Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:10:46 +0800 | From | Tang Chen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] page_alloc: Make movablecore_map has higher priority |
| |
Hi Liu, Wu,
On 12/06/2012 10:26 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 2012-12-6 9:26, Tang Chen wrote: >> On 12/05/2012 11:43 PM, Jiang Liu wrote: >>> If we make "movablecore_map" take precedence over "movablecore/kernelcore", >>> the logic could be simplified. I think it's not so attractive to support >>> both "movablecore_map" and "movablecore/kernelcore" at the same time.
Thanks for the advice of removing movablecore/kernelcore. But since we didn't plan to do this in the beginning, and movablecore/kernelcore are more user friendly, I think for now, I'll handle DMA and low memory address problems as you mentioned, and just keep movablecore/kernelcore in the next version. :)
And about the SRAT, I think it is necessary to many users. I think we should provide both interfaces. I may give a try in the next version.
Thanks. :)
| |