lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] xen/blkback: do not leak mode property
>>> On 04.12.12 at 19:21, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> This looks necessary but insufficient - there's nothing really
>> preventing backend_changed() from being called more than once
>> for a given device (is simply the handler of xenbus watch). Hence
>> I think either that function needs to be guarded against multiple
>> execution (e.g. by removing the watch from that function itself,
>> if that's permitted by xenbus), or to properly deal with the
>> effects this has (including but probably not limited to the leaking
>> of be->mode).
>
> If another watch does really trigger after the kfree(be) in
> xen_blkbk_remove(), wouldnt backend_changed access stale memory?
> So if that can really happen in practice, shouldnt the backend_watch be
> a separate allocation instead being contained within backend_info?
>
> Looking at unregister_xenbus_watch, it clears removes the watch from the
> list, so that process_msg will not see it anymore.

That's not the scenario I was talking about: I'm concerned about
multiple calls to backend_changed() to similarly leak "mode" (and
possibly cause other bad stuff to happen) while the device is still
alive - after all it overwrites "mode" without checking what's in
there.

Jan



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-05 09:42    [W:0.033 / U:2.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site