lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] tile/PCI: use for_each_pci_dev to simplify the code
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> wrote:
> On 12/4/2012 2:57 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>>>
>>> Use for_each_pci_dev to simplify the code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>>> ---
>>> arch/tile/kernel/pci.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c b/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
>>> index 7598226..aac1cd5 100644
>>> --- a/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
>>> +++ b/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
>>> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void __devinit fixup_read_and_payload_sizes(void)
>>> u16 new_values;
>>>
>>> /* Scan for the smallest maximum payload size. */
>>> - while ((dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL) {
>>> + for_each_pci_dev(dev) {
>>> u32 devcap;
>>> int max_payload;
>>>
>>> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void __devinit fixup_read_and_payload_sizes(void)
>>>
>>> /* Now, set the max_payload_size for all devices to that value. */
>>> new_values = (max_read_size << 12) | (smallest_max_payload << 5);
>>> - while ((dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL)
>>> + for_each_pci_dev(dev)
>>> pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
>>> PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD | PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ,
>>> new_values);
>>>
>>>
>> This patch looks correct to me, as far as it goes.
>>
>> Of course, any time we use for_each_pci_dev(), it's a good clue that
>> this code won't work for hotplug, so presumably you don't care about
>> hotplug on this system.
>
> Hotplug development is under way at the moment.
>
>> tile/kernel/pci_gx.c has a function of the same name, implemented
>> completely differently, which suggests that some unification or
>> refactoring might be possible.
>
> Sorry, which function are you referring to? You mention MPS/MRS so perhaps you're talking about fixup_read_and_payload_sizes()?

Yes, sorry I didn't make that more clear. Both tile and tile-gx have
fixup_read_and_payload_sizes() implementations.

>> In general, I think the PCI_EXP_DEVCAP and PCI_EXP_DEVCTL code for MPS
>> and MRRS management belongs in the PCI core, not in drivers or
>> architectures (it's fine if they provide device- or platform-specific
>> constraints), so anything you can do to move in that direction would
>> be good.
>>
>> Bjorn
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
> http://www.tilera.com
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-04 22:41    [W:0.745 / U:0.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site